1. TERRA Teaching and Research Centre, Biosystems Dynamics and Exchanges, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, Liège University, 5030, Gembloux, Belgium
2. 塔里木大学信息工程学院，新疆 阿拉尔 843300
3. 中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所，北京 100081
Comparison of Near-Infrared Spectrum Pretreatment Methods for Jujube Leaf Moisture Content Detection in the Sand and Dust area of Southern Xinjiang
BAI Tie-cheng1,2, WANG Tao2, CHEN You-qi3, MERCATORIS Benoît1*
1. TERRA Teaching and Research Centre, Biosystems Dynamics and Exchanges, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, Liège University, 5030, Gembloux, Belgium
2. College of Information Engineering, Tarim University, Alaer 843300, China
3. Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
Abstract：Precision irrigation for jujube crop in southern Xinjiang, China, is underlying to optimize the water use in such a drought-affected region. Water stress can be remotely assessed by evaluating the leaf moisture content using spectroscopy. These measurements are however affected by the presence of coarse sand and dust of the leaves induced by dry climates. This paper studied different methods to correct the spectral data in order to reduce the scattering noise with a baseline induced by such a jujube leaf covering. The reflectance of 120 leaf samples were measured by means of a near-infrared spectrometer (1 000～1 800 nm) and their moisture content was obtained by conventional drying method. The original reflectance spectrums were pre-processed by the normalization method, the moving smoothing method, the Savitzky-Golay (SG) convolution smoothing method, the SG first derivative method, the standard normal variables (SNV) method and the multiple scatter correction (MSC) method. The results of these different methods were compared and analyzed by means of partial leastsquares regressions (PLSR) allowing selecting sensitive spectral bands and establishing prediction models. The results showed that a significant reflectance peak related to the water content of the jujube leaves was located at 1 443 nm and that a local minimum of reflectance occurred at 1 661 nm. The predicition model based on the MSC method presented the best scattering noise reduction. The model performances were R2=0.750 4, RMSEP=0.034 3 and RMSEPCV=0.021 5. The five characteristic wavelengths were 1 002, 1 383, 1 411, 1 443 and 1 661 nm. In this experiment, the MSC method had a good ability to reduce the scattering noise generated by sand and dust covering. The preprocessing improved the selection ability of characteristic wavelengths and the accuracy of the prediction model. The results can therefore provide an effective detection method for the jujube leaf water in the sandy and dusty area of Southern Xinjiang, China.
作者简介: BAI Tie-cheng, (1982—), PhD at Liège University e-mail:
baitiecheng1983@163.com
引用本文:
白铁成，王 涛，陈佑启，MERCATORIS Benoît. 南疆沙尘区骏枣叶片水分含量检测的近红外光谱预处理方法对比[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2019, 39(04): 1323-1328.
BAI Tie-cheng, WANG Tao, CHEN You-qi, MERCATORIS Benoît. Comparison of Near-Infrared Spectrum Pretreatment Methods for Jujube Leaf Moisture Content Detection in the Sand and Dust area of Southern Xinjiang. SPECTROSCOPY AND SPECTRAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 39(04): 1323-1328.
[1] Wang Shuwen, Zhao Yue, Wang Lifeng, et al. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016, 32(20): 187.
[2] Bai Tiecheng, Wang Yaming, Zhang Nannan, et al. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2017, 37(11): 3419.
[3] Li Minzan, Sun Hong, Yang Wei, et al. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017, 33(Supp. 1): 137.
[4] Hu Zhenzhu, Pan Cunde, Pan Xin, et al. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52(12): 39.
[5] Chu Wanlin, Qi Yanbing, Chang Qingrui. Journal of Northwest A&F Unibersity(Nat. Sci. Ed. ), 2016, 44(9): 65.
[6] Liu Chang, Sun Pengsen, Liu Shirong. Forest Research, 2017, 30(1): 88.
[7] Ajanto K Hazarika, Somdeb Chanda, Santanu Sabhapondit, et al. NIR News, 2018, 29(1): 9.
[8] PazJosé, Visconti Fernando, Chiaravalle Mara, et al. Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 2016, 408(13): 3537.
[9] Maria F Buitrago, Thomas A Groen, Christoph A, et al. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2018, 69: 237.
[10] Anastassia Baxevani, Krzysztof Podgórski. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 2018, 48(2): 448.
[11] Nikonov A V, Davletshin R V, Iakovleva N I, et al. Journal of Communications Technology and Electronics, 2017, 62(9): 1048.
[12] Tong Peijin, Dua Yiping, Zheng Kaiyi, et al. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2015, 143: 40.
[13] Li Wenbing, Lu Jidong, Dong Meirong, et al. Energy & Fuels, 2018, 32(1): 24.
[14] Taddeuccia T N, Haighta R C, Leea H Y, et al. Nuclear Data Sheets, 2015, 123: 135.
[15] Liang Liang, Zhang Lianpeng, Lin Hu, et al. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(1): 18.
[16] Sun Jun, Cong Sunli, Mao Hanping, et al. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017, 33(5): 178.
[17] Zhang Qianxuan, Li Qingbo, Zhang Guangjun. Spectroscopy: An International Journal, 2012, 27(2): 93.
